Copyright Policy Privacy Policy Contact Us Instagram Facebook
Top Rated Posts ....
Why Pakistan was unable to intercept Indian missiles? BBC Urdu report Why Pakistan was unable to intercept Indian missiles? BBC Urdu report Why India used drones to attack Pakistan? Hamir Mir reveals eye-opening details Why India used drones to attack Pakistan? Hamir Mir reveals eye-opening details Hamid Mir challenges Indian anchor Arnab Goswami on his false claim Hamid Mir challenges Indian anchor Arnab Goswami on his false claim Exclusive video of Udhampur airbase's massive destruction Exclusive video of Udhampur airbase's massive destruction Najam Sethi's exclusive interview with Karan Thapar on Pakistan India clashes Najam Sethi's exclusive interview with Karan Thapar on Pakistan India clashes Mufti Samar Abbas got out of control when a youngster asked a question Mufti Samar Abbas got out of control when a youngster asked a question

ATC Rejects Molvi Khadim Hussain Rizvi's Request For Bail

Posted By: Dr. Nasir, February 18, 2019 | 16:17:03

ATC Rejects Molvi Khadim Hussain Rizvi's Request For Bail


An anti-terrorism court in Lahore on Monday rejected Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) chief Khadim Hussain Rizvi's request for bail in a case lodged against him for launching a violent protest against the acquittal of Aasia Bibi.

Tehreek-i-Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYRA) chief Pir Afzal Qadri's request for bail was also rejected by the ATC.

Civil Lines police had registered a FIR under sections 290/291/353/427/186/188 of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and section 6 of the Sound System Punjab Ordinance 2015 against Rizvi and other leaders of the TLP for protests after Aasia Bibi was acquitted by the Supreme Court in October last year. Section 7 of Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was later added to the FIR.

Rizvi was presented before the judge in ATC-IV amid tight security. His lawyer argued in court that a suitable environment be provided for the betterment of his client's health.

Rizvi's counsel had stated in the bail petition that the provision of the ATA was falsely included in the case. The lawyer had argued in the petition that the FIR was altered and fabricated and claimed that the petitioner and others accused had not committed any offences against the state, but had been politically victimised.

He had argued that the investigation had been completed by police and keeping Rizvi behind bars would serve no purpose.

The counsel had also stated that Rizvi had been imprisoned since his Nov 23 arrest and it was causing him health issues due to his disability. He requested the court to grant Rizvi bail.

After hearing arguments from both sides, the court rejected the request for bail.

Source





Advertisement





Popular Posts Follow Us on Social Media

Join Whatsapp Channel Follow Us on Twitter Follow Us on Instagram Follow Us on Facebook


Comments...