We tried hard to get Maulana with us but now I don't think he will come with us - Barrister Gohar
Imran Khan's sister Noreen Niazi speaks against Pakistan's institutions on Indian news channel
Indian cricketer Mohammad Siraj advises to avoid travelling through Air India
Iqrar Ul Hassan's tweet on Imran Khan's sister Noreen Niazi's interview to Indian Tv
Drone fired from Afghanistan in Tajikistan kills 3 Chinese employees
Terror Attack Near White House Sparks Afghan Refugee Crackdown - Kamran Khan's Analysis
PTI's struggle against drones is giving its outcome, as an article has been published in washingtonpost against drone strikes. Here is that article.
What happens when other nations get drones?
The Nov. 26 news article “Pakistan unveils homegrown drones” demonstrated precisely why U.S. drone policy must change.
The U.S. drone program seems to be operating under the rationale that if we have the drones, we make the rules. It operates without respect to national borders or citizenship, striking countries with which we are not at war and killing at least four U.S. citizens. Reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch dispel the myth of precision, detailing gruesome civilian injuries and casualties. “Signature strikes” target individuals not for their wrongdoings but for their characteristics. No system of justice exists for those wrongfully sentenced to death by U.S. drones.
U.S. officials have declined to provide transparency or oversight for the program or to comply with international law. These policies harden anti-American sentiment and weaken national security.
What if other countries used drones? Critics have often posed this question as a cautionary hypothetical, yet it will soon be reality. Pakistan’s unveiling of its drone technology should be a warning to the U.S. government that now is the time to introduce transparency, oversight and the rule of law into its drone program. It is time to lead by example.
Source
